M. S. a v. STATE, 231 So. 3d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . other students’ attention, amounts to disrupting an educational institution in violation of section 877.13 . . .
H. N. B. a v. STATE, 223 So. 3d 308 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . following the court finding him guilty of disrupting an educational institution in violation of Section 877.13 . . . Section 877.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2016), states: “It is unlawful for any person ... . . . We previously have interpreted section 877.13(l)(a) as follows:The statute is designed to prohibit acts . . . Our sister courts similarly have held that section 877.13(l)(a) contains a specific intent element. . . . The third district further has held that section 877.13(l)(a)’s use of the term “ ‘disrupt’ is synonymous . . .
A. M. F. M. v. HOLMES, 830 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 2016)
. . . . § 877.13(1); N.C. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 14-288.4(a)(6).. . . .
S. L. a v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . interfering with the administration and functions of an educational institution in violation of section 877.13 . . . Section 877.13(l)(a) states: “(1) It is unlawful for any person: (a) Knowingly to disrupt or interfere . . . Although M.C. involved a facial challenge to section 877.13 on the grounds it violated M.C.’s right to . . . We affirmed M.C.’s adjudication under section 877.13(l)(a). . . . We explained:The obvious intent of section 877.13 is to ensure that the educational institutions and . . . interference with the lawful administration of his school’s daily functions in violation of section 877.13 . . . See § 877.13, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . Specifically, section 877.13(l)(a), provides that “(1) it is unlawful for any person: (a) [k]nowingly . . . This Court has previously addressed the elements necessary to uphold a conviction under section 877.13 . . . Thus, “[t]his is sufficient to establish a violation of section 877.13.” Id. . . .
A. S. C. A v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
. . . or interference with the lawful administration of an educational institution in violation of section 877.13 . . .
M. M. a v. STATE, 997 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
. . . M.M. claims that he cannot be found to have violated section 877.13, Florida Statutes (2007), because . . . In relevant part, section 877.13 provides:(1) It is unlawful for any person:(a) knowingly to disrupt . . . AMP. should not be read to require disruption of classes to constitute a violation of section 877.13. . . . That is sufficient to establish a violation of section 877.13. See T.J. v. . . . interfered with community assistant’s ability to assist other students, was a violation of section 877.13 . . .
Q. K. a v. STATE, 945 So. 2d 650 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
. . . Q.K. pleaded no contest to disruption of an educational facility in violation of section 877.13, Florida . . .
J. J. a v. STATE, 944 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
. . . The state filed a petition for delinquency, alleging that J.J. violated section 877.13, Florida Statutes . . . Section 877.13, Florida Statutes (2005), provides in relevant part:(1) It is unlawful for any person . . . to disrupt any school or school board function, activity on school board property, or classroom.§ 877.13 . . .
L. T. v. STATE, 941 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
. . . Section 877.13, Florida Statutes (2005), defines the crime of disrupting a school function as follows . . .
C. R. a v. STATE, 927 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
. . . , 867 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (stating even a student with special needs may violate section 877.13 . . .
A. M. P. A v. STATE, 927 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
. . . This case involves the interpretation of section 877.13, Florida Statutes, which provides:(1) It is . . .
J. M. S. a v. STATE, 921 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
. . . 877.03, Florida Statutes (2004), and disruption of an educational institution in violation of section 877.13 . . .
T. J. A v. STATE, 867 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
. . . Section 877.13, Florida Statutes, provides:(1) It is unlawful for any person:(a) knowingly to disrupt . . . 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding that appellant’s conduct amounted to prohibited conduct under section 877.13 . . .
T. T. a v. STATE, 865 So. 2d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
. . . Section 877.13 states that “[i]t is unlawful for any person knowingly to disrupt or interfere with the . . . of any educational institution, school board, or activity on school board property in this state.” § 877.13 . . . In the matter below, appellant was charged with violating section 877.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2003 . . .
C. K. a v. STATE, 850 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
. . . interfering with the lawful administration or function of an educational institution in violation of section 877.13 . . . Section 877.13(1), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that:(1) It is unlawful for any person:(a) knowingly . . . The Third District in M.C. noted that the apparent intent of section 877.13 is to ensure that educational . . . There a juvenile was convicted under section 877.13(1) for engaging in a fight with another student over . . .
S. W. W. a v. STATE, 833 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
. . . delinquency finding him guilty of willfully interrupting or disturbing a school in violation of section 877.13 . . . Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal for violation of section 877.13 . . .
CUSTOM SHIP INTERIORS v. ROBERTS, 300 F.3d 510 (4th Cir. 2002)
. . . The ALJ concluded that Roberts’ average weekly wage was $877.13. . . .
M. J. Y. v. STATE, 811 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
. . . . § 877.13(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999); § 775.082(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .
T. H. a v. STATE, 797 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
. . . . § 877.13(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . to and from school is clearly part of the administration of an educational institution under section 877.13 . . .
L. W. G. a v. STATE, 785 So. 2d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
. . . See §§ 784.03(l)(b), 877.13(3), 775.082(4)(a) and (b), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .
N. W. a v. STATE, 767 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 2000)
. . . Florida filed a petition charging N.W. with disruption of a school function, in violation of section 877.13 . . .
M. C. a v. STATE, 695 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
. . . M.C., a juvenile was found guilty in a delinquency proceeding of violating section 877.13, Florida Statutes . . . IIThe state filed a one count petition of delinquency against M.C. for violation of section 877.13. . . . IllAs we are faced with a facial challenge to the overbreadth and vagueness of section 877.13, we find . . . M.C. attempts to analogize section 877.13 to the ordinance struck down for vagueness in Coates v. . . . M.C.’s assertions to the contrary, we do not think that the same can be said of section 877.13. . . .
MELLON BANK EAST PSFS, N. A. a v. DiVERONICA BROS. INC., 983 F.2d 551 (3d Cir. 1993)
. . . Although the Letter Agreement listed DiVero-nica's debts to the Hubbell Companies as $86,-877.13, Mellon . . .
G. O. a v. STATE, 606 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
. . . any such school,” (b) section 228.091(2) requires a trespass “upon school property” and (c) section 877.13 . . .
M. O. a v. STATE, 595 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
. . . State, 479 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); § 877.13(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .
ROWSE v. PLATTE VALLEY LIVESTOCK, INC. a, 597 F. Supp. 1055 (D. Neb. 1984)
. . . defendant of 108 cows ($57,184.33) and the defendant’s commission on the sale ($692.80), a total of $57,-877.13 . . .
GONZALES, v. CITY OF BELLE GLADE, SMITH v. STATE, 287 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1973)
. . . Disturbing Religious and other Assemblies; Ch. 876, Criminal Anarchy; and, Ch. 877, Miscellaneous (877.13 . . .
In S. v., 57 U.S. 135 (U.S. 1853)
. . . of sale, and should pay to the complainant out of the proceeds of the sale the foregoing sum of $39,-877.13 . . .
